SUSD Needs A Political Exorcism

A variety of terms are being used to describe Denise Birdwell.

As emails are reviewed and events reconstructed from the past year, it's difficult to find anything good to say about the superintendent who has been placed on administrative leave by the SUSD School Board.

Birdwell is being called Machiavellian and mean-spirited.  Some say she's a master manipulator. Others are convinced she's a narcissist with strong tendencies toward penis envy.

It also sounds like Denise Birdwell isn't afraid to dabble on the dark side.  

Governing Board members had no choice but to finally place her on leave.   While that should have happened months go, Birdwell is now one step closer to being gone for good.  It's only a matter of time.  

No matter how quickly the board musters up the courage to officially cut ties with Birdwell, the damage to the school district has already been done.  In just the short span of a year, the public has totally lost trust in the five-member school board - especially President Barbara Perleberg, Vice President Kim Hartmann and Pam Kirby, who have been the architects of the cover-up of corruption.

The control Birdwell had over the elected members of the School Board - including newcomers Allyson Beckham and Sandy Kravetz - has been remarkable.  It's as though they have been possessed.  When looking back on this period in which SUSD's reputation was systematically destroyed, the five board members will probably conclude:  "The devil made us do it."

That's why there needs to be a political exorcism.

There has been a community outcry for the members of the board to resign. But don't count on it.  These are five women who have refused to take any responsibility whatsoever for the havoc they have helped create. Time after time they have denied that their decisions have either directly caused or contributed to horrible hiring choices and poor policies.  For them, resignation will not be the better part of valor.
    
Remember that this saga started when the School Board hired Denise Birdwell without interviewing any other candidates ... and the crooks and con men naturally followed.  Whatever happens from here, these board members can't be trusted to hire a new superintendent.

Hartmann and Kirby, whose terms on the board expire this year, are keeping their options open.  Both have taken the initial step to run for re-election by taking out the necessary documents.  In order to run again, they would need to file nominating petitions.  They would then have until early August to submit them to qualify for the November ballot.  

If they decide to enter the race for another four-year term, it will mean their extra-large egos have made them even more delusional than most people already believe.

For now, "interim" is the term being most frequently used in SUSD.  The school district has an interim chief financial officer, an interim chief operating officer  ... and soon there will be an interim superintendent.  Because of the vacuum of leadership on the School Board, it will be the interim leadership team that will be responsible for restoring order in the school district by getting the $229 million bond program back on track.

That will at least start the process of purging the demons that are plaguing SUSD.

How Much Longer Will The Council Give Bike Companies A Free Ride?

Love them or hate them ... a lot of people believe there are too many lime and yellow bikes scattered around the city. And there could be even more on the way.
 
Councilman Guy Phillips, who's not reluctant to share his skepticism about the Bike Share concept, says the two primary bike companies, Lime Bike and ofo, have approximately 4,000 bikes in Scottsdale. Most are spread out in the southern and central parts of the city - although some have started showing up as far north as the intersection of Thompson Peak Parkway and Hayden Road.
 
Currently, the two bike companies aren't accountable. They don't have to answer to anyone, including the city. But councilmembers have to answer to their constituents. That's something the bike companies shouldn't underestimate. Unless they want the city to start regulating their businesses - which would undoubtedly begin with limiting the number of bikes each company would be allowed to provide their potential customers.
 
There's no question that Bike Share is popular, at least with users.
 
According to Lisa Johnson, the city's Transportation Plan and Transit Program Manager, since the program began three months ago, there have been about 110,000 "rides" in the city. That exceeds what the city had originally estimated, says Johnson. It also makes Scottsdale the most successful market in the country for the two companies.
 
Unfortunately, that high usage has produced negative feedback to both the city and the companies. The three most often received complaints are parked bikes blocking sidewalks, the sheer number of bikes and the visual clutter created by the high number of bikes.
 
Councilmembers are also receiving an earful from citizens, both from those who like the program and those who think Bike Share is out of control. Councilman Phillips, for one, is frustrated. "When people call me and complain, I have to tell them we (the city) can't do anything about it. It's embarrassing." Some citizens share Phillips' frustration as documented by photos of bikes that have been tossed in ponds, stuffed in trashcans or mangled.   
 
When the Council convened last week in a work-study session to discuss the Bike Share issue, they concluded that several things could be done - especially having the companies educate riders about bike etiquette. Not the most realistic of the recommendations, because the companies are in the bike business ... not the behavior modification business.
 
More tangible ideas included: Requiring companies to install bike racks and force riders to use the racks for picking up and returning bikes. In addition, they suggested imposing fees to cover the cost of hauling away bikes left in canals, fountains, front yards and around public art. The Council also discussed encouraging the companies to do a better job of dispersing bikes throughout the city, like placing more in the DC Ranch area.
 
That suggestion prompted Councilwoman Kathy Littlefield to factiously say: "I can hardly wait to hear from North Scottsdale residents."
 
While she is enthusiastic about the program, Councilwoman Suzanne Klapp told the Bike Share companies that she didn't want to tell them how to run their business, but added: "Please listen to citizens and the Council because we're the ones taking the heat, and you have to do something about it."

Denise Birdwell Is Radioactive

SUSD's toxic environment is taking a toll: Teachers are exiting, parents are protesting and taxpayers worry that their money is being mismanaged ... to put it mildly.
 
To make matters worse, the school district's name is constantly in the news and being tied to allegations of a cover up of chronic corruption. And the Respect Our Scottsdale Students' (ROSS) Facebook page is beginning to look like a police blotter as its editors uncover reams of evidence incriminating individuals who are complicit in the erosion of ethics.
 
All of it is costing SUSD dearly.
 
Superintendent Birdwell's erratic behavior and sadistic management style have taken a personal price. It has cost her friends. And of the few who are left, most are referred to as her "Fake Friends." That's the people too petrified to either stand up to her or take a walk - because they fear losing their fat paychecks and fringe benefits.
 
There are those, however, who still hold out hope that the dark cloud parked over the school district will pass. Some with impaired judgment are even trying to save the superintendent from the inevitable ending to her tenure by creating distractions from the shock and awe of what's happening to SUSD.
 
Take, for instance, Businesses United for Scottsdale Schools (BUSS), the brainchild of School Board member Kim Hartmann.
 
Tomorrow BUSS is presenting an event called the "Coronado Success Initiative, a Summary of Year One Progress." One of the keynote speakers will be Dr. A. Denise Birdwell. The same esteemed Dr. Birdwell who is systematically destroying our school district's credibility.
 
Kudos to those who have been working diligently to turn around the performance of Coronado High School students - especially ASU's Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College and Scottsdale Charros. Chris Gilmore, the new principal, deserves a special shout out for how he has managed the educational makeover of the south Scottsdale high school. But it's the teachers who are the real heroes because they've had to adjust to significant changes and increased expectations.
 
The event will be well attended. Who, after all, doesn't support improving the academic performance of Coronado students.  Attendees will hear that things are on track. But they will be reminded that the process to get Coronado students up to the learning level of their peers at other SUSD schools isn't a sprint, it's a marathon. So the community needs to be patient.
 
There's also plenty that people won't hear tomorrow.
 
Superintendent Birdwell's enemies list won't come up. Neither will the short-term memory loss she exhibited when interviewed during SUSD's internal investigation into when she knew Laura Smith, the former CFO, had a conflict of interest that forced Smith to resign. SUSD teachers' vote of "no confidence" in the superintendent won't be mentioned, either. And don't expect to hear anything about the attorney general's probe into possible improprieties in the Birdwell administration nor the effect the superintendent's political radioactivity is having on the community.
 
No, tomorrow will be a chance to escape reality for 90 minutes about what's being allowed to happen to our school district.
 
Coincidentally, there will be a rally today at 4 PM at Coronado High School, 7501 E. Virginia Ave.  The ROSS sponsored event's rallying cry is "terminate the superintendent, demand fiscal responsibility and support our teachers."

There is no bigger disappointment in the Scottsdale Unified School District than Kim Hartmann - which, given SUSD's politically dysfunctional environment, says a lot about the first-term member of the School Board.
 
When voters elected Hartmann four years ago, they had high hopes for her. She had an impressive resume and long list of endorsements from movers and shakers inside and outside the school district. Now the confidence in Hartmann has been shaken. Even some of the opinion leaders who endorsed her have lost respect for her and regret their endorsements.
 
Wait ... someone is probably saying: "What about Pam Kirby?"
 
Kirby, unaffectionately referred to by SUSD insiders as the Governing Board's "Black Widow," is different than Hartmann. While both board members will be up for re-election this year, it's Kirby who is the political animal using the School Board to advance her political aspirations. What you see is what you get.
 
However, the Kim Hartmann who was elected to the School Board in 2014 is not the Kim Hartmann who is failing to represent taxpayers in 2018. The 2014 Hartmann disappeared and has been replaced by the 2018 Hartmann.
 
Going back to 2014, Hartmann campaigned in tandem with Francesca Thomas to fill two seats on the School Board. They were thought to be a formidable team. Hartmann won the election, but Thomas, who received about 6,000 fewer votes than Hartmann, didn't. Kirby, an incumbent, was re-elected by a comfortable margin.
 
The following year, Hartmann helped found Businesses United for Scottsdale Schools (BUSS), a non-profit organization. The organization, which partnered with the Chamber of Commerce, was created to advocate bringing business leaders and the school district together to develop a stronger Scottsdale public school system. While the organizational model made sense, BUSS faced challenges - primarily from the business community in which many leaders were more supportive of private schools than public ones.
 
Nevertheless ... BUSS is still active. But it's struggling to achieve the organization's objectives.
 
The next year, 2016, was when Hartmann went through an about-face. She became infatuated with the new superintendent's mission to make SUSD more competitive with private and charter schools. Unfortunately, Denise Birdwell's scheme triggered an exodus of teachers who fled SUSD for other teaching opportunities. Parents were outraged - but that didn't prevent Birdwell from replacing top administrators with several of her friends and former colleagues.
 
None of that fazed Hartmann, who had become an acolyte of Birdwell.
 
As conditions worsened in the school district, including the controversy surrounding the reconstruction of Hopi Elementary School, some of Hartmann's stunned supporters confronted her about her radical transformation - particularly how she could continue supporting Superintendent Birdwell's take-no-prisoners management style that was doing more harm than good.
 
Hartmann's response was always the same: "Be patient. Give the superintendent's strategy time to work. You'll see."     
 
In the meantime ... Hartmann has not announced if she intends to seek re-election. If she does, voters will be curious to know which Kim Hartmann will be running.